Holbeach and Fleet DMMO 392 - Register of DMMO applications

DMMO number
DMMO 392
Intended effect of the application
Claimed footpath between Damgate and Branches Lane.
Grid references for start and end of claimed route
TF36492441 to TF37242441
Principal cities,towns,villages near claimed route
Holbeach
Parish
Fleet, Holbeach
Electoral Division
Holbeach Rural
District
South Holland
Applicant's name
Mrs V Gemmell
Applicant's address
16 Princes Street, Fleet, Holbeach, PE12 7BB
Date of application
01 September 2017
Council officer
J. Foy
Application number
DMMO 392
Council telephone number
01522 782070
Council email
countryside_access@lincolnshire.gov.uk
Date of council's decision
6 June 2024
Outcome and reasons for the decision

The Council determined not to make a modification order on the following grounds:

  1. Documentary evidence suggests the route has been a feature in the landscape since the dismantlement of the railway in the 1960s, but this alone does not support the existence of a public right of way over the Application Route. 
  2. A Highways Statement and Map were made under section 31(6) of the Highways Act 1980 and were deposited with the County Council on 15.08.2013, which did not mark any routes along the line of the Application Route. This was followed by a Highways Declaration which was lodged with the County Council on 15.11.2017, these provide sufficient evidence to demonstrate the landowner had no intention to dedicate the route as a public right of way.
  3. User evidence suggested there had not been consistent use of the whole of the Application Route by the user witnesses spanning the relevant statutory term identified, which was 1997-2017. This was due to the installation of a barrier gate across the whole width and the verges of the track, which was subject to the Application Route, at some point during the relevant statutory term. The barrier gate caused users to leave the track to manoeuvre around the gate. Notices at either end of the way stating, ‘Private Road, No Parking’, also indicate a lack of intention to dedicate the way as a public right of way.
  4. For the above reasons a public right of way over the Application Route cannot be reasonably alleged to subsist by statutory dedication. 
  5. The consideration of a relevant common law term, spanning from 1980 to 2023 also fails for the same reasons given above.
Details of appeal to the Secretary of State

No appeal has been made.

Date modification order made
Decision 6 June 2024
Confirmation,non confirmation (with,without mods)

Not applicable

Completed
Yes
Documents