- Summary
-
Route 1 - alleged footpath from Mill Lane to public footpath 218 via the churchyard and cricket ground.
Route 2 - alleged footpath between the easternmost end of Mill Lane and the common land. - DMMO number
- DMMO 43
- Intended effect of the application
- Claimed footpath
- Grid references for start and end of claimed route
- Route 1 TF39278806 to TF39538814. Route 2 TF39408810 to TF39498813
- Address of property on which claimed route lies
-
Eastfields, Mill Lane, Grimoldby, Lincs
- Postcode(s) of address related to claimed route
- LN11 8TB
- Principal cities,towns,villages near claimed route
- Louth
- Parish
- Grimoldby and Manby
- Electoral Division
- Saltfleet and the Cotes
- District
- East Lindsey
- Applicant's name
- Grimoldby and Manby Parish Council
- Date of application
- 23 October 1985
- Council officer
- Senior Definitive Map Officer
- Application number
- DMMO/43/GRIMOLDBY
- Council telephone number
- 01522 782070
- Council email
- Countryside_access@lincolnshire.gov.uk
- Date of council's decision
- 16 January 1987
- Outcome and reasons for the decision
-
Routes 1 and 2 decisions made to make a modification order to record these routes as public footpaths on the grounds that they have been subject long usage by the public.
- Details of appeal to the Secretary of State
-
N/A
- Date modification order made
- 01 March 1989
- Confirmation,non confirmation (with,without mods)
-
Parts I(i) and II(i) of the Modification Order refer to Route 1 and parts II(ii) and II(ii) of this Order refer to Route 2. Objections were lodged against the Modification Order.
Route 1 the objections lodged against the parts of the Modification Order made for this route were withdrawn and Part I(i) of the Order was confirmed on 1 October 2004 with part II(i) being confirmed on 12 June 2017. This route is recorded as Grimoldby Public Footpath 932 in the Definitive Map and Statement.
Route 2 the objections were not withdrawn against the parts of the Modification Order made for this route and the Secretary of State made a determination on 27 February 2018 to not confirm these parts of the Order on the grounds that there was insufficient documentary evidence demonstrating the existence of a historical public right of way over this route and that there has not been a sufficient amount of use of this route by the public to have given rise to a public right of way.
- Completed
- Yes
- Documents